SXSWi 2009: Wow!

On Tuesday, I got back from Austin, Texas. I was speaking at SXSW Interactive 2009. It was my first time at South-By, and I can say right now that I am going next year - no matter what. My presentation was great (thank you, Alex, for offering me this great opportunity!) - read on for more about my presentation. I met so many incredible people, including Gary Vaynerchuk, Kevin Rose, and danah boyd. Being under 21 at SXSW was tough, since so many after-parties were at 21+ venues, but it worked out. SXSW was overwhelming, especially going for the first time. Basically, it doesn’t stop. Day, night, morning, evening - you name it. There is always something going on at SXSW. Just check my Twitter stream. I reconnected with some “old” friends from the Boston Social Media scene, like Steve Garfield, Clarence Smith, and Chris Brogan. The Bigg Digg Schindigg was amazing - I finally saw a live Diggnation! Check my Flickr for pictures. I’ll be uploading many more in the coming days. The panels I saw were amazing. Gary Vaynerchuk was the most inspirational speaker I saw, up there with the “SHIFT Happens” people and the Web and Feminism panel. I made a PDF of all the tweets I tweeted during SXSW. Download it. Most recent at the top.

My Presentation

As you all _should_ know, I was on a panel about the future of technology in education, called Blackboards or Backchannels: The Techno-Induced Classroom of Tomorrow. Alex Leavitt Moderated, and I spoke along with Archana Ramachandran, Kelly Sutton, and Diana Kimball. Someone liveblogged our panel, check it out! I spoke of my EduTech project and my feelings about, at least in small class settings, the use of off-hours technology only. For example, in small seminar classes, I see laptops as walls and severe distractions. They might be employed to “enhance” communication, but instead, they replace human-human interaction with superficial and removed conversation. Technology cannot replace or fix bad teaching - I was surprised to see some teachers react negatively to that statement, for surely I thought that they would all be in favor of quality teaching, too. I was also surprised to find out that predominately older K-12 teachers and university professors saw my own (and the groups) views as conservative. I never thought about it that way. The educators in the room appeared to want validation from us students. They wanted us to approve the unbridled use of technology in their classrooms. Not to say that risk-taking and experimentation are bad, because they are very crucial to the learning process, but the successful use of technology in classrooms need to be thoughtfully planned out. Technology cannot be there just to be there. One needs a goal. A teacher should be able to answer the question, “Why are you using technology in your classroom?” A teacher does not, or should not, just assign an essay or exam. Just to let you know, my philosophy of technology and education only applies to small class settings. I have yet to seriously consider the implications of technology in large classrooms, simply because I haven’t been in those situations and, I don’t particularly agree with lecture based styles of education.

The response to our panel was mixed. Following the Twitter hash tag (#sxswed) was interesting: one person thought she should have been on the panel and did not restrain her anger, and others were frustrated with our “non-techno induced” classroom. Questions were engaging, but somewhat strange. One woman suggested that Kelly and I had been brainwashed by the educational systems in this country. Why? Because we both go to smaller liberal arts colleges? Or because at least I (don’t know about Kelly…) had a very progressive education in high school without standards? Anyways, others were more positive. One man raised the issue of learning, in general - how do you learn of find things on the Internet? Another man, who seemed younger, perhaps a recent college graduate, seemed offended by my advocating against the use of technology in the classroom, and proceeded to give various reasons how Twitter had helped him. Just to clarify, I think Twitter is amazing, but, do you really have a need to use it in class? How about on the weekends, when the students and the professor are not in the same room together?

Check out the Twitter search for #sxswed. Again, go back a few pages. You’ll find some interesting responses.

Overall

I’m gong next year. Meet me there. I will try to get myself on a panel (email me if you have ideas or are interested in having me speak on your panel), but we’ll see. Don’t forget to check out my pre-SXSW interview with SXTXState. Want to meet next year? Email me. Check out Flickr photos, too.

K.

I am only speaking for myself in this post. I cannot vouch for the other panelists. Just FYI.

Photos

Slideshow

Video

SXSW Interactive 2009

I will be speaking on a panel at SXSW Interactive 2009, in just a few weeks. I’m excited. A year ago, I barely dreamed of attending SXSW, but being able to speak is such an honor. For those of you who don’t know about the organization, SXSW is a company that is devloted to histing and promoting events related to media. They have three conferences: Music, Film, and Interactive. For more info, check out their website.

In August, Alex Leavitt, a senior at Boston University, invited me to speak on his panel - he had been looking into my Academic Technology work and was interested in my EduTech program I created at the Cambridge School of Weston. I was amazed - my only previous speaking engagemtns were at PodCamps in the Boston area and at an education conference in Hawaii. I didn’t realize the impact of my work as a high school student. Of course, I accepted his offer.

So, Here I am, creating my own Educational and Technological Philosophy. I’ve just begun rethinking and redefining my thoughts on Education and Technology. Once I have something, I’ll let you know.

Here are the details about my presentatinon and the panel I will be speaking on. If you’re planning on attending SXSW Interactive, it’d be great to meet. Send me an email.

Panel Info

Blackboards or Backchannels: The Techno-Induced Classroom of Tomorrow
Room B
Sunday, March 15th
11:30 am - 12:30 pm

The traditional classroom: obsolete? Chalkboards, lectures, and even teachers may be on their way out as social technology enters the classroom. How do kids want technology integrated into the curriculum? Or do they even want it? Five students speak out to debate the potential for Wikis, backchannels, and social tech, and dispute tomorrow’s r/evolution in teaching and learning.

Alex Leavitt / Boston University
Kelly Sutton / Founder, HackCollege
Kabren Levinson / Philosopher, Technologist, Artist, Bard College
Archana Ramachandran / Campus Ambassador, Radar/Tiny Pictures/UT Austin
Diana Kimball / Harvard College

Anyone else going? Let me know.

My Schedule

Academic Technology

It has been a while since I finished my EduTech capstone project, and my ideas on Academic Technology have changed. I recently began thinking again about tech in the classroom, especially since I spoke about Academic Technology in Hawai’i in early January, and in March, I will be speaking at SXSW on a panel of students about the future of the classroom.

My Vision


Jeff Han demonstrating his multi-touch technology. Photo Credit: jurvetson

I have complex and radical visions for how technology will be apart of our lives. I imagine classrooms being outfitted with interactive and touch human-friendly technology that allows students to better collaborate and work in groups in and out oft he classroom. I picture libraries actually being great places for study. I picture technologically elaborate and visually appealing technology and multi-media laboratories. I see blackboards being transformed into information hubs (backchannels) that make it easy for students and teachers to share information. Unfortunately, schools do not have money to spare these days and teachers and students are no longer motivated to talk to each other or interested in going to school. Education moves slowly, while technology moves quickly. Education in general does not know how to adapt to the future. Technology budgets are slim and often misspent leaving both teachers and students behind.

Reality

During my capstone project, I mostly experimented with free social internet technologies, like Moodle, Wordpress, Twitter, Tumblr, and others. Throughout most of high school, I had a laptop in front of me. I multitasked; taking notes, looking up terms in science class, and more. However, in college, there has been only one class in which I used my computer (my first semester Media and Society class. Today, I find technology to be more destructive and distracting. Most of the applications and services I praised I now find to be useless inside the classroom. On the other hand, I find technology to be more useful outside the classroom. In college, an environment where oftentimes teachers and students do not communicate outside of the classroom (the division between academics and life are clearly defined), social technology usage outside of the classroom is more effective and really engages students with students, students with teachers, and teachers with teachers. I realize now that technology can not be a replacement for human to human classroom discussion and involvement. Besides, I again am reminded that technology is so often misused and misguided in educational environments. My number one recommendation still stands; in order to successfully use technology inside and outside of the classroom, Academic must be a top priority to students, teachers, and administrators. Technology must be just as thought out as any assigned reading or writing.

Conclusion

As you can see, I’m well on my way to developing my own Educational and Technological philosophy. I will be writing more about this topic. I may even start a blog about it. We’ll see. Please, I beg of you, email me.

LiTc: Tools of Web 2.0

Sorry for the long delay. I’ve had this written for a while, just never got to typing it up.

New Web 2.0 startups are created every day. It can be tough to discover which ones are really worth looking at and using. In this post, I will discuss the Web 2.0 tools I use and how I use them in my life.

I’ll start out with the easy ones. I use Facebook to keep up with friends, Flickr and Viemo to host my best photos and videos, digg to find “stuff”, delicious to store my bookmarks, LinkedIn to maintain an online resume, and last.fm to log my music. I use these applications the way they were meant to be used. Most Web 2.0 tools have clear intentions, while others are more complex. I will discuss in detail three services that I feel have more complex applications. I will look at Google Apps for Your Domain, Twitter, and Tumblr.

Email


Gmail

I use Gmail for my custom domain, kabrenlevinson.com. Basically, I get to use all the Google tools (Gmail, Docs, etc) with my own email address. I do not use a local client - I have fallen in love with the Gmail interface and absolutely how Gmail manages my mail. I try to keep zero (0) items in my inbox. I either files messages away under one or more labels (I have “Action,” “Hold,” “Friends,” “Family,” “Tech,” and “Work”) or delete them. Keeping my inbox clean and organized allows me to figure out which messages I actually need to read and lets me find messages from the past more easily. Gmail’s labels are also far superior to the usual folders you would find in any ordinary email client - with Gmail, you can apply more than one label. I also have Gmail set up to send and receive email from many different accounts (kabrenlevinson.com, Nerd News Radio, school email, and others). I enjoy being able to access my email from wherever whenever I want.


Gmail Settings

Documents


Google Docs

Though there are other services that offer free online word processing and document storage, Google Documents still works best for me. I have never written an essay in Google Docs, but I’ve used it to store PDF’s, .docs, and spreadsheets. I enjoy the seamless integration with Gmail and the easy-to-use sharing feature. At the moment, I share about three of four documents used for planning events and group trips. Google Docs is also great for writing collaborative essays; instead of emailing a .doc around many times, Google Docs only requires that you manage a single document.

Communication


Twitter

While I regularly use SMS, email, AIM, and Facebook for messaging, Twitter is quickly becoming one of the most convenient communication tools in personal, group, and public domains. In addition to maintaining a network of people with whom I mostly have conversations, I also use Twitter to develop ideas and theses for essays and projects of my own. Being able to strip an idea, particularly complex notions, down to 140 characters can at times reveal the _real_ message behind the thought. Some say that Facebook is Twitter but better, but Facebook does not support a constant flow of conversation among individuals and groups. Being on Twitter is like being in a big coffee shop where people are conversing with everyone else. Twitter also shows it strengths at conferences, large meetings, and lecture-style classrooms. Oh, Twitter also has an amazing search tool.


Twitter Search

Sharing Items


My Tumblr Dashboard

Though many services make it clear and easy to share text, images, movies, quotes and conversations, nothing makes it as simple as Tumblr. Tumblr allows one to post items to their own “tumblelog” as well as view the posts of others who they are following on a dashboard page. Tumblr makes it effortless to post an idea, blog post, or photograph without doing “work.” While posting items to a Wordpress is tiresome, using Tumblr’s bookmarklet makes it hard not to share items. Sometimes I use Tumblr like delicious - I post things that I find interesting.

Conclusion

This is only a beginning for Web 2.0 Applications and how they can be used. I have detailed the services I use most and discussed the ones that I find to be the most influential in my life. In the next, and final, post in my “Life in the Cloud” series, I will talk about what is missing from Web 2.0 and offer some thoughts on the future. As always, email or Skribit me suggestions, thoughts, ideas, and more.

Two New Essays

Just thought I’d mention I posted two new essays on my website I wrote as final projects for two different classes. The first is called “Free Will,” which I wrote for my Intro to Philosophy class, and the second is called “The Apprehensive,” which I wrote for my First Year Seminar. “Free Will” is about whether or not human beings have freedom of will, using the texts of Descartes, Nietzsche, and Richard Linklater. “The Apprehensive” is about the role of philosopher in society according to Descartes.

Download “Free Will” and “The Apprehensive” as PDF’s. Let me know what you think!

Also, be sure to check out some of the other essays I’ve written - I plan to keep that page updated over time.

2009 New Year’s Resolutions

  • Get up early in the morning to see the sun rise and have a cup of tea
  • Practice Judaism more seriously
  • Blog more
  • Learn how to podcast in college
  • Publish an essay (or two) in a journal
  • Become a “Jewish Buddhist”, or Jubu
  • Design a website from scratch
  • Write more for my own enjoyment
  • Learn how to make certain things (writing, photography, etc) part of my life
  • Play cello again
  • Push myself at school

Happy Hanukkah!

Happy Hanukkah! You know, I haven’t yet seem Menorah’s around campus (and I doubt I will), but Christmas carols are being played on the radio and Kline, our dining hall, is slowly becoming red and green.


Digital Hanukkah. Photo Credit: oskay.

In America, or anywhere in the world, really, excluding Israel and other non-Christian parts of the Middle East, Asia, Africa, etc, it is a bit awkward being Jewish. Everything here is Christmas, Christmas, Christmas. The songs, decorations, and even the Tweets. Now, I’m not complaining - I think that “Happy Holidays” spell of the past 5 years or so is a load of crap - I’m happy people are expressing themselves truly these days. If you say Merry Christmas to me, you’ll get Happy Hanukkah in return. As you can tell, I’ve become more Jewish over the past six months and I’ve recently watched “The Hebrew Hammer” a few times (go see it!). It was hard for me growing up in a society and going to a school where barely anyone celebrated the holiday’s I celebrated, or performed the weekly rituals I performed. That being said, I love being Jewish. Happy Hanukkah!

Gifts


“Festival of Lights”. Photo Credit: digidi.

Christmas and Hanukkah do have something in common, besides the time of year, and at least in the U.S., in Israel, I don’t think gifts are so common (there, the holiday is less about money and consumerism, and more about the story, which I will get to in a minute). I will probably get some clothes this year, maybe a piece of software and a new iPod Nano. If I get lucky, I’ll get another lens, but I doubt it.

The Story


A lit Menorah. Photo Credit: ableman.

Since Jews only occupy 2% of the world, I assume that many of you do not know the story of Hanukkah, so here it is. 2000 years ago, the Greeks ruled the land of Israel, or Judea, and controlled the Jews who lived there. Antiochus Epiphanes, a Greco-Syrian king, outlawed the Jews from worshipping and praying to our God, studying Torah, and practicing our own customs. He forced the Jews to worship Greek Gods, and allegedly erected a statue of Zeus in the Holy Temple of Jerusalem.

Judah Maccabee created a resistance force that fought against oppression known as the Maccabees. Judah’s rather small army was so determined, coming from their strong belief and faith in God, that they were able to defeat and intimidate larger and more powerful armies. Judah used the power of God to encourage his soldiers. The Maccabees, after almost three years of fighting, drove the Greco-Syrian armies out of Judea. The message here and the message of Hanukkah is “Not by might, not by power, but by spirit.”

After the Greco-Syrians vacated Judea, Judah Maccabee and his people reoccupied the HOly Temple. They cleaned it, renovated it, and rededicated it. When they first reentered the Temple, they found that the holy oil was de-purified by the Greco-Syrians. Only one jug of pure oil remained, only enough for one day. “Then a miracle occurred.” When the Maccabees lit the Menorah, it lasted not for one day, but for eight, which was enough time for them to purify more oil. This is why Hanukkah is observed for eight days, and why the Hanukkah menorah has not seven candles, but eight. So there you go, the story of Hanukkah. (Source).

I hope you have a Happy Hanukkah, Merry Christmas, Happy Kwanzaa, or whatever holiday you observe (festivus, maybe?).

LitC Part 2: Why Web 2.0?

A few weeks ago I announced and introduced a series I’m starting on the blog called “Life in the Cloud.” This series talks about how one uses Web 2.0 and cloud computing in his or her daily life, whether at home, work, or school. This weeks installment will (hopefully) answer the question “Why Web 2.0?” and inspire a philosophical discussion about Web 2.0.

Honestly, I do not know why Web 2.0 is happening - these days, technology (particularly the Internet) moves very quickly and people are not able to think about the changes that are occuring. Web 2.0 and cloud computing is about making the Internet and the Web more social. Ideally, Web 2.0 enhances relationships, discussions, and communities, but does not replace them. Web 2.0 is “happening” because the Internet is capable of it - most of the programming languages people design Web 2.0 services in were around twenty years ago. This is only the beginning - there is still a long way to go, but users and developers are finally taking advantage of the full potential of the Internet.


Global Network

Fifteen years ago, the Net was not being fully exploited. Because the Internet is so decentralized, it is a perfect mode of communication; if one user, section, or part goes offline, the entire network is not affected. Web 2.0 and cloud computing is the “true destiny” of the Internet - it was meant for this type of community building. In the past, technological revelations in the fields of communication have enriched only one-to-one communication or mass one-way communication. The Internet enables people to create global communities but still remain attached to themselves, their families, and hometowns.


Desktop Computer

Web 2.0 decereases dependence on desktop computers. Cloud computing makes technology more mobile, portable, and ultimately, more human. In its essence, Web 2.0 is the experession, using the Internet, of a basic human need to talk and to create. One could say cloud computing is happening because up until now, technology, including the Internet, has been very mechanic, systematic, and uncreative - humans have had to adapt to technology instead of technology adapting to us. The Internet makes mobile computing on devices like the iPhone and Google’s Android more useful and successful - there is no longer a need to sync a device with a desktop or laptop computer. Because of the Internet, mobile devices are actually mobile devices.


Democracy

Web 2.0 also represents a shift of power on the Internet and has enabled, or reenabled, I should say, old and new ways of personal expression that have been lost in todays world. Cloud computing is democracy on the Internet - no one is really in control, but the Internet doesn’t just run on its own, either. The Internet is a managed decentralized network, if that makes sense.


Web 2.0 Services. Image Source.

Though this barely breaks the ice on the question “Why Web 2.0?,” I hope this post provides a good philosophical basis for some of the questions surrounding Web 2.0, cloud computing, and the Internet in general. I will answer more of these questions in Part 4, where I will address what is missing from Web 2.0. Check out the Introduction for more info about the series.

As always, please email me, Twitter me, or otherwise-me your feedback.